Technical depth instead of gut feeling
Code, architecture, tests and operation are specifically evaluated, not just superficially described.
- Code and architecture analysis
- Quality, testing, CI/CD
- Stability and operation
Do you need technical due diligence for software, app or platform?
We check code quality, architecture, security and operational risks and give you a reliable decision template for the next steps.
A reliable software report is created by an independent software agency with experience in architecture, security and operations. It assesses code quality, architecture, security, technical debt, test coverage and operability and provides a prioritized risk and effort assessment. CodeGuides prepares reports confidentially, with NDA if requested, and translates technical findings into a decision-making basis for management, investors or buyers.
Searches with experiences, review, forum or Reddit show that decision-makers want an independent assessment, not just vendor promises. A software audit should therefore produce traceable findings: which risks are critical, what is only technical debt, which measures are truly needed before purchase, investment or launch, and what effort is realistic. A good assessment makes these points reviewable.
Is the architecture viable? Are security, data protection, database design and operations implemented cleanly? Are there risks that should delay a purchase, financing round or launch?
A checklist or automated scanner does not replace an assessment. What matters is technical judgement from developers who can also stabilise, modernise and operate software in production.
Not every question needs the same expert opinion. These three checks cover the most common concerns, from code quality to pre-launch security.
Do you want to have code checked without knowing exactly what depth is necessary? We'll arrange this in a free preliminary consultation. When it comes to AI-generated code, leads Have the AI app checked continue.
Reason: Doubts about quality and maintainability. Subject: structure, technical debt, tests, dependencies. Result: prioritized findings. It differs from the architecture review by focusing on concrete code.
Occasion: Scaling, conversion or takeover. Test subject: system section, data model, scalability, operation. Result: Assessment and target image. Broader than the code audit, more technical than pure advice.
Reason: Launch, audit request or suspicion. Test item: Auth, secrets, input validation, OWASP, data access in the app and backend. Result: Risks with impact and measures.
An expert opinion is only valuable if it Creates decision-making ability. We combine technical depth with management readout so that risks, effort and priorities are transparent.
Code, architecture, tests and operation are specifically evaluated, not just superficially described.
Don't just name risks, but also evaluate the impact, probability of occurrence and effort.
Executive summary, clear recommendation and budget corridor for the next steps.
We create quick clarity, without disrupting your operations. The process is transparent, structured and delivers usable results.
Low coordination effort, clear results. Each step has defined outputs and traceable progress.
Targets, systems, roles, access to repo, infrastructure and monitoring. We define the scope.
Code review, architecture analysis, security checks, performance tests and operational views.
Findings, prioritization, action plan and Q&A with your team or management.
Verify critical points or start implementing them straight away: stabilization, roadmap, sprints.
A good report provides clear time periods, clear test points and usable recommendations.
Ideal before a decision or as a quick reality check.
Detailed assessment plus prioritized action plan.
We look at system, process and infrastructure together.
Clear risks, clear priorities, clear recommendations.
An independent evaluation requires reliable data. We examine the core technical areas that determine stability, security and costs.
Optionally, we also check product and process risks, e.g. E.g. team setup, roadmap risks or operating costs. For software due diligence when purchasing an app company or app investment, we adjust the scope.
Quality, structure, dependencies, design patterns, technical debt, documentation.
Auth, permissions, secrets, GDPR, OWASP top 10, supply chain risks.
Runtime, monitoring, scaling, costs, CI/CD, deployments and reliability.
If you buy an app company or plan an app investment, you need robust technical due diligence. We examine risks, licensing issues and operability so that your deal is not compromised hidden technical debt fails.
We identify technical debt, security risks and architectural breaks that influence the purchase price or integration.
We check whether the system can be operated stably and what costs realistically arise in the event of growth.
You receive priorities, effort estimates and a realistic roadmap for stabilization or re-platforming.
You get clear results that allow you to invest, buy, acquire or restart.
Quick overview of critical risks, technical debt and next steps.
Detailed analysis with prioritization, effort estimate and action plan.
Joint evaluation, prioritization and start of implementation.
Initial general reports usually cost between 1,000 and 2,500 €. The exact cost depends on complexity and desired depth. We will clarify the framework in the preliminary discussion.
If you are faced with a decision or have uncertainties in the system, an appraisal will save you time and budget.
After the preliminary discussion, we usually start within a few days. For a short report, clear goals and access to the repo and infrastructure are sufficient.
The exact costs depend on the complexity and desired accuracy of the report. As a rule, initial general reports from us cost between €1,000 and €2,500. We will clarify the specific framework in a free preliminary consultation based on your scope.
Usually repo access, documentation, monitoring/logs and, if necessary, test access. We will agree on the scope at kickoff.
You receive an independent assessment of code, architecture, operations and risks. The report provides priorities, effort estimates and clear next steps.
We check the technical quality, security, performance, dependencies and operating status of the app including backend and infrastructure.
We clarify scope and goals, check code, architecture, security, licenses and operation. You will then receive a risk matrix and price/plan recommendations.
Yes. We provide a decision template for investors with clear risks, cost consequences and implementation options.
We work confidentially and will sign an NDA upon request. Results stay with you.
The short report provides a quick, focused assessment with top risks. The full report provides a deeper analysis, detailed prioritization and an action plan.
Yes. We offer stabilization sprints, PoCs or full development, depending on your goals.
Use our interactive configurator to get a realistic, non-binding cost range for your project.
In a 45-minute consultation, we clarify how your project can be delivered in a technically and commercially sensitive way.
In a short analysis call, we clarify how we can take over operations, security and continued development for your existing software.